Hand writing versus Keyboard Writing: Effect on Word Recall
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58213/ell.v4i2.50Keywords:
handwriting; keyboard writing, ergonomics of writing, word memory, cognition, educational implications of digitization embodiedAbstract
This study determined how writing style affected people's recall and recognition of words. The three writing techniques used were handwriting using a pen on paper, typing on a conventional laptop keyboard, and typing on an iPad touch keyboard. A properly counterbalanced within-subjects experimental design was used, and 36 females between the ages of 19 and 54 participated. In this study, participants were given a wordlist and directed to use one of three distinct writing modalities to record words that were read aloud to them. For this study, the wordlist paradigm was applied. A person's memory for words typed using handwriting, a standard keyboard, and a virtual iPad keyboard was tested using oral free recall and recognition. For the analysis of the data, non-parametric statistics were used. Following analyses revealed that participants' free memory of words written in the handwriting condition was considerably higher than that of both keyboard writing conditions for the free recall measure. The findings demonstrate an all-encompassing influence of the writing medium. The findings also reveal that participants' free recall of terms written in handwriting was much better. There was no obvious effect of writing mode in the recognition condition. This shows that handwriting may have unique cognitive benefits that may not be completely retained while writing on a keyboard, especially concerning word memory components. One of these advantages might be word recall. The implications of the study's findings on cognition and education are investigated.
References
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2012). Through the models of writing: Ten years after and visions for the future. In V. Berninger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 567-572). New York: Psychology Press.
Berninger, V. (Ed.). (2012). Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
Calvo, P., & Gomila, A. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chandler, D. (1992). The phenomenology of writing by hand. Digital creativity, 3(2 & 3), 65-74. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/14626269209408310
Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478-484. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
Chen, Y., Fu, S., Iversen, S. D., Smith, S. M., & Matthews, P. M. (2002). Testing for dual brain
processing routes in reading: a direct contrast of Chinese character and pinyin reading using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 1088-1098. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1162/ 089892902320474535
Cibulka, P. (2013). The writing hand: Some interactional workings of writing gestures in Japanese conversation. Gesture, 13(2). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1075/gest.13.2.03cib
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencies: Routledge.
Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4), 312-317. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/ j.1469-8749.2007. 00312.x
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication, 32(4), 365-387. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/356600
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). Action as a binding key to multisensory integration. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 425-441). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108(3), 819-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers & Education, 67(0), 98-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.007
Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
Goodnow, J. J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). “The grammar of action”: Sequence and syntax in children's copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 82-98. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0010- 0285(73)90005-4
Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Hensher, P. (2012). The missing ink: The lost art of handwriting: Pan Macmillan.
Jensenius, A. R. (2008). Action - sound: developing methods and tools to study music-related body movement. (No. 324), University of Oslo, Oslo.
Johansson, R., Wengelin, Å., Johansson, V., & Holmqvist, K. (2010). Looking at the keyboard or the monitor: relationship with text production processes. Reading and Writing, 23(7), 835-851. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11145-009-9189-3
Kato, C., Isoda, H., Takehara, Y., Matsuo, K., Moriya, T., & Nakai, T. (1999). Involvement of motor cortices in retrieval of kanji studied by functional MRI. Neuroreport, 10(6), 1335-1339. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1097/00001756-199904260-00033
Keim, B. (2013). The science of handwriting. Scientific American Mind, 54-59. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/scientificamericanmind0913-54
Kiefer, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding the human conceptual system in perception, action, and internal states. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert & A. WHerwig (Eds.), Tutorials in action science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 15-20. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised.
Cognition, 21(1), 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6
Longcamp, M., Anton, J.-L., Roth, M., & Velay, J.-L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1492-1500. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00088-0
Longcamp, M., Anton, J.-L., Roth, M., & Velay, J.-L. (2005). Premotor activations in response to visually presented single letters depend on the hand used to write: a study on left-handers. Neuropsychologia, 43(12), 1801-1809. http://dx.doi.org10.1016/-j.neuropsychologia. 2005.01.020
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J.-C., Anton, J.-L., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., & Velay, J.-L. (2008). Learning through hand- or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: Behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), 802-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20504
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J.-C., & Velay, J.-L. (2006). Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Human Movement Science, 25(4-5), 646-656. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.humov.2006.07.007
Longcamp, M., Tanskanen, T., & Hari, R. (2006). The imprint of action: Motor cortex involvement in visual perception of handwritten letters. NeuroImage, 33(2), 681-688. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.042
Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M.-T., & Velay, J.-L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119(1), 67-79. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford Press.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: a user's guide
Mangen, A. (2013). “scripta manent”? The disappearing trace and the abstraction of inscription in digital writing. In K. E. a. F. Pytash, Richard E. (Ed.), Exploring technology for writing and writing instruction (pp. 100-114). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Mangen, A., & Velay, J.-L. (2010). Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. In M. H. Zadeh (Ed.), Advances in Haptics (pp. 385-402). Vienna: IN-TECH web.
Mangen, A., & Velay, J.-L. (2014). Cognitive implications of digital media. In M.-L. Ryan, L. Emerson & B. Robertson (Eds.), The Johns Hopkins Guide to digital humanities (pp. 72-78). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mayes, A. R., & Roberts, N. (2001). Theories of episodic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 356(1413), 1395-1408. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1098/rstb.2001.0941
McCullough, M. (1996). Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Naka, M., & Naoi, H. (1995). The effect of repeated writing on memory. Memory & cognition, 23(2), 201-212. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/BF03197222
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I., Guez, J., & Dori, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 24(5), 1091-1104. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1091
Nickerson, R. S. (2005). Technology and Cognition Amplification. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and Technology: The Impact of Tools on the Nature and Development of Human Abilities (pp. 3-27). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
Olive, T., & Passerault, J.-M. (2012). The visuospatial dimension of writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 326-344. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/0741088312451111
Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L. (2009). Visual objects can potentiate a grasping neural simulation which interferes with manual response execution. Acta Psychologica, 130, 147-152. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.004
Preiss, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Intelligence and technology: the impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4135/9781412984997
Sasaki, M. (1987). Why do Japanese write characters in space? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10(2), 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/016502548701000201
Shapiro, L. A. (2010). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
Smoker, T. J., Murphy, C. E., & Rockwell, A. K. (2009). Comparing memory for handwriting versus typing. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/154193120905302218
Tan, L. H., Xu, M., Chang, C. Q., & Siok, W. T. (2013). China’s language input system in the digital age affects children’s reading development. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 1119-1123. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1213586110
Torrance, M., Alamargot, D., Castello, M., Ganier, F., Kruse, O., Mangen, A., . . . Van Waes, L. (Eds.). (2012). Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Torrance, M., van Waes, L., & Galbraith, D. (Eds.). (2007). Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Trageton, A. (2003). Å skrive seg til lesing: IKT i småskolen. Oslo: Universitetsforl.
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 1- 25. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological review, 80(5), 352. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/h0020071
van der Weel, A. (2011). Changing Our Textual Minds: Towards a Digital Order of Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human movement science, 10(2), 165-191. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G
Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Neuwirth, C. (Eds.). (2006). Writing and digital media. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Velay, J.-L., & Longcamp, M. (2013). Motor skills and written language perception: Contribution of writing knowledge to visual recognition of graphic shapes. In Y. Coello & A. Bartolo (Eds.), Language and action in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 161-176). New York: Psychology Press.
Wamain, Y., Tallet, J., Zanone, P.-G., & Longcamp, M. (2012). Brain responses to handwritten and printed letters differentially depend on the activation state of the primary motor cortex. NeuroImage, 63(3), 1766-1773. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.020
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625- 636. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/BF03196322
Wilson, M. (2008). How did we get from there to here? An evolutionary perspective on embodied cognition. In P. Calvo & A. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach (pp. 375-393). Amsterdam: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616- 3.00019-0
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins.