Measuring Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58213/ell.v3i1.33Abstract
To understand both writing processes and writing interventions, as well as writing interventions themselves, it is sometimes necessary to assess text quality. However, the idea of 'text quality' is commonly misunderstood or misunderstood. A more precise understanding and explanation of what it means to be a good writer is the purpose of this book, according to the editors. Chapters in the book are broken down into the following categories: definitions of writing skill, rater effects, and automated essay scoring, to name a few.
References
• Burstein, J., Tetreault, J., & Chodorow, M. (2013). Holistic Discourse Coherence Annotation for Noisy Essay Writing. Dialogue & Discourse, 4(2), 34-52.
• Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writing, 18(1), 7-24.
• He, Tung-hsien, Wen Johnny Gou, Ya-chenChien, I. Shan Jenny Chen, and Shan-mao Chang. 2013. Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement and Bias Patterns in EFL Writing Performance Assessment. Psychological Reports 112(2):469-485. doi: 10.2466/03.11.PR0.112.2.469-485.
• Shermis, M.D., & Burstein, J. (Eds) (2013). Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current applications and new directions. [Book review by Marie Stevenson]. Journal of Writing Research, 5(2), 239-243.
• Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Tillema, M., Van Steendam, E., Raedts, M. (2010). Writing. In S. Graham, A. Bus, S. Major, & L. Swanson (Eds.). Application of Educational Psychology to Learning and Teaching. APA Handbook. Volume 3 (p. 189-228). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
